|
gk111127 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
human build???????????????????????????
caelumn9 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
tsk tsk tsk good architecture!
cambodian555 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i believe it doesnt belong in the 7 man made wonders Christ the Redeemer was completed in 1931 but Angkor Wat in Cambodia was built in 1200 AD and the largest man made religous monument in the world and its not even one of the 7 wonders of the world in 900 AD Angkor city had a population of 1,500,000 and London in1801 had a population of 1,117,290 and Angkor City back then was larger then Los Angeles CA today
kjygyrl (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
maybe because you see it all the time?? idk, that I think it looks cool!!!
julinmorgan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm brazilian and I strongly disagree with the election of the Christ Redeemer as a world wonder. The world has lots of things that are way more beautiful than that. Even the city of Rio does
stephengvw (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the tall statue of a man stirs ancient memories of visting enormous towering statues on beautiful planets way back when I was free... so long ago
luis22099 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
u 4got stonehedge
coraliengahuia (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
awesome thankyou :)
GLespaul21 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think the Belogradchik Rocks in Bulgaria had to become part of the new world wonders.
I dont think the Arena in Rome is a big wonder if you ask me.
minghan05 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
My understanding of 'wonders" would have to be something beyond human imagination or not technologically/humanly possible at the time when it was built. Based on that, while most the old 7 wonders are in total ruins, they are wonders because it's hard to imagine how they can exist at that time without the tools we have today. So Egypt's Pyramid should be still in, and Taj Mahal is just like any other majestic building to me. I really don't understand why it's a wonder. |